The case of Mother on Ok.ru illustrates a digital dilemma. On one hand, the platform preserves a culturally significant film that would otherwise be inaccessible to younger generations and diaspora communities. On the other, it normalizes a post-Soviet media ecology where piracy substitutes for a functional streaming market. Rights holders receive no revenue, and there is no incentive to restore the film in high definition. We propose a “digital repatriation” model: Mosfilm could license its 1990s catalog to Ok.ru for ad-supported streaming, with revenue split via blockchain tracking—a system already tested by Russian platform MTS.
4.1. Preservation Function Users explicitly treat the upload as an archive. One comment reads: “I saw this in theaters in ’97. Couldn’t find it anywhere on disc. Thank you for saving it.” Another: “My mother loved this film. I wanted to show my daughter. Only found it here.” This suggests Ok.ru fills a gap left by official distributors. Mother 1996 Ok.ru
4.3. Rights Holder Status The film’s rights are currently held by Mosfilm and Panfilov’s estate (Panfilov died in 2023). Mosfilm has periodically removed uploads of its major titles (e.g., Battleship Potemkin ) from Ok.ru but has not targeted Mother —likely due to its low commercial value. This tacit tolerance enables the upload to remain online. The case of Mother on Ok
Ok.ru allows users to upload videos and share them within interest-based groups. Unlike YouTube’s automated Content ID system, Ok.ru’s copyright enforcement is largely reactive. Our search query “Mother 1996 Ok.ru” yields a single, stable upload (approximately 1.6 million views as of March 2026) in a group titled “Soviet and Russian Cinema Classics.” The uploader notes: “Rare film. For educational purposes only. No commercial use.” This disclaimer mirrors the “non-commercial use” justification common on post-Soviet pirate sites. Rights holders receive no revenue, and there is