Macroeconomia (4K FHD)

The 1970s delivered a devastating empirical refutation of the simple Phillips Curve. Following the OPEC oil embargo of 1973 and subsequent supply shocks, the U.S. and other developed economies experienced simultaneous rises in both unemployment and inflation—stagflation. This was theoretically impossible according to the original Phillips Curve, which had posited that one could only move along the curve, not shift it outward.

The theoretical underpinning of this era was intuitive: when aggregate demand increased, the economy moved closer to full capacity. Firms, facing a tightening labor market, bid up wages to attract scarce workers. To maintain profit margins, these higher labor costs were passed on to consumers as higher prices. Conversely, during a recession, high unemployment reduced workers’ bargaining power, slowing wage growth and thus inflation. Throughout the 1960s, the Phillips Curve was accepted as a cornerstone of Keynesian economics. Policymakers believed they could "fine-tune" the economy, moving along the curve to achieve a politically optimal mix of, say, 4% unemployment and 2% inflation. This belief, however, contained a fatal flaw: it ignored the role of expectations. Macroeconomia

The most dramatic application of this theory came during the of 1979–1982. When newly appointed Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker announced a determined policy to crush double-digit inflation by restricting money supply growth, rational expectations theory predicted that if the policy was credible , inflation expectations would fall quickly, and the recession would be shorter and shallower than under adaptive expectations. In reality, the policy lacked immediate credibility. Businesses and workers doubted the Fed’s resolve, leading to a deep, painful recession with unemployment peaking at nearly 11%. Only after the Fed proved its commitment through sustained contraction did expectations finally adjust, and inflation fell dramatically. This episode taught central bankers that credibility is the most valuable asset they possess. To manage expectations, they needed a clear, transparent, and consistent policy framework. The 1970s delivered a devastating empirical refutation of

By credibly anchoring long-term inflation expectations, central banks broke the self-fulfilling spiral of inflationary psychology. In this modern synthesis, the Phillips Curve became very flat in the short run: large movements in unemployment produced only small changes in inflation. This gave central banks more room to respond to recessions without fear of igniting inflation. However, the flattening of the curve also presented a new puzzle: if inflation no longer responds strongly to labor market slack, how should central banks fight deflationary recessions? The 2008 Global Financial Crisis tested this, as massive increases in unemployment failed to cause significant deflation, leading to fears of a "liquidity trap." This was theoretically impossible according to the original

The 1970s illustrated the dynamics of "adaptive expectations." As the central bank repeatedly tried to boost demand, workers and firms learned to expect higher inflation. The Phillips Curve shifted upward, creating a high-inflation, high-unemployment equilibrium. The key lesson was that the trade-off is only a short-run phenomenon, and it vanishes entirely if policymakers attempt to exploit it systematically.