To “game all world,” we propose a three-layer system:
Several real-world projects foreshadow a fully gamed world:
Instead of dry policy papers, the UN issues “Epic Quests.” Example: Quest: “Clean the Gyre” (Ocean plastic). Objective: Remove 10M kg plastic. Reward: Tax incentives + in-game cosmetic “Ocean Guardian” title. Time limit: 180 days. 5. Case Study Simulation: Carbon Neutrality by 2040 gaming all world
Gaming All World: A Framework for Global Problem-Solving Through Mechanized Play
2.1 Intrinsic vs. Extrinsic Motivation Self-Determination Theory (Deci & Ryan) posits that humans are motivated by autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Modern games satisfy all three. Global governance fails to provide immediate feedback (competence) or relatable narratives (relatedness). GAW bridges this gap. To “game all world,” we propose a three-layer
“Gaming All World” is not a naive call to turn everything into a Nintendo cartridge. Rather, it is a recognition that humanity already plays—we play status games, wealth games, and war games. The proposal here is to consciously redesign the rules. By aligning the feedback loops of global systems with the motivational architecture of games, we might achieve what the UN Charter could not: mass, joyful, sustained cooperation.
| Project | Game Mechanic | Global Relevance | | :--- | :--- | :--- | | | Puzzle-solving (protein folding) | Crowdsourced scientific discovery | | EVE Online | Player-driven economy & diplomacy | Simulated resource wars & alliances | | Bitcoin Mining | Proof-of-work (points for computation) | Energy consumption game (dysfunctional) | | Forest (app) | Anti-procrastination (grow virtual trees) | Real-world reforestation funding | | Pokémon GO | Location-based capture (AR) | Physical activity & local exploration | Time limit: 180 days
These prototypes prove that game mechanics can drive real-world outcomes. However, they are siloed. GAW requires integration.
.