The cognitive burden on a bodyguard is severe and understudied.
A significant ethical critique holds that executive protection exacerbates inequality. By privatizing safety, the wealthy can insulate themselves from consequences—social, legal, or physical—that affect the general population. This creates a two-tiered society of the shielded and the exposed. Furthermore, EPAs are sometimes complicit in shielding principals from accountability (e.g., escorting executives away from protestors or press). Bodyguard
While state-level bodyguards (e.g., for heads of government) may have lethal authorization, private EPAs are bound by the same self-defense laws as any citizen. This creates the “last resort dilemma”: by the time a threat is imminent enough to justify deadly force, the principal may already be harmed. Thus, modern training emphasizes escape and evasion over confrontation. The cognitive burden on a bodyguard is severe
