Bhanwari Devi May 2026

It was in this moment of absolute despair that Bhanwari Devi found an unlikely ally: a group of feminist lawyers and human rights activists in Jaipur. They filed a public interest litigation (PIL) not to retry the rape—though that would come later—but to define what workplace sexual harassment meant in a country that had no law against it. At the time of Bhanwari Devi’s rape, India had no specific law against sexual harassment at the workplace. The Indian Penal Code only covered rape and outraging modesty, but it did not address the systemic power dynamics of harassment. The Supreme Court of India took up the PIL (titled Vishakha & Ors v. State of Rajasthan ), using Bhanwari Devi’s case as the foundational fact.

Yet, in a rare turn of events, the Supreme Court intervened. In 2017, on the 25th anniversary of her rape, the Supreme Court upheld the conviction of Badri Lal, restoring the life sentence. The court observed that lower courts had been swayed by "caste prejudices and patriarchal mindsets." As of today, Bhanwari Devi continues to fight for the conviction of the remaining four accused. Now in her 60s, Bhanwari Devi lives in a modest house on the outskirts of Jaipur, still fighting for her children’s education and her own safety. She is no longer a sathin . The government pension she receives is meager. She has been forgotten by the same state machinery she once served. bhanwari devi

Her defining act of courage was also the act that would nearly destroy her life. In late 1992, she learned that the family of a local landlord, Ganga Ram Gujjar, was preparing to celebrate the birth of a grandson by marrying off their one-year-old daughter to a three-year-old boy. Child marriage was already illegal under the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. Bhanwari Devi reported the plan to the district authorities and tried to persuade the family to stop. The Gujjars, a powerful upper-caste community, were furious that a Dalit woman dared to interfere in their customs. It was in this moment of absolute despair

To honor Bhanwari Devi is to understand that legal frameworks are meaningless without social transformation. It is to recognize that the #MeToo movement in India did not begin in newsrooms or film studios. It began in a potter’s hut in Rajasthan, in the dirt, where a poor, Dalit woman refused to look away from injustice—even when it cost her everything. The Indian Penal Code only covered rape and

The message was medieval: A lower-caste woman who asserted legal authority over an upper-caste man must be put back in her place through sexual violence. It was not merely a crime of passion; it was a calculated act of feudal punishment. Bhanwari Devi did what almost no Dalit rape survivor dared to do at the time: She filed a First Information Report (FIR) immediately. The case went to trial as State of Rajasthan v. Bhanwari Devi (a misnomer, as she was the victim, not the accused). The trial court in Jodhpur heard the evidence. The medical examination confirmed sexual assault. Witnesses testified.

Yet, on November 28, 1995, the trial judge acquitted all five men. The reasoning was stunning in its patriarchal audacity. The judge argued that since Bhanwari Devi was a sathin who moved freely among men for her work, she was not "chaste." More infamously, the judge reasoned that a high-caste Gujjar man would not “lower himself” to rape a Dalit woman because she was untouchable. The judgment stated: “It is unbelievable that an upper-caste person would touch a lower-caste woman… It is difficult to believe that they would like to pollute their mouth by kissing a lower-caste woman.”